The same can probably not be said for the correspondence between Ted Hughes and Sir Christopher Lever about the Save the Rhino Appeal. These letters, however, give an insight in Hughes’ ecological engagement, and they demonstrate how his poetry, his passion for fishing and his charity work all flowed into one another. The correspondence begins in October 1986 with a request for Sir Christopher Lever for a manuscript poem to be auctioned at a special charity event at Sotheby’s. Hughes happily obliged and entertained a number of spin-off ideas to raise more money: he arranged for publication of the poem in the Sunday Telegraph; he negotiated with British Airways and Charles Branson of Virgin to insert the poem as a fold-out in their in-flight magazine on African routes; and he suggested a limited edition to be published by The Rampant Lions Press. The limited edition, in any case, seems to have fallen through, but the letters give quite a good insight about Hughes’ expertise in limited edition publishing. Students in the history of the twentieth-century book will want to read these documents for the details they contain about paper and papermaking, book sizes, costs and so on.
Other manuscript items included in the sale are an autograph fair copy containing 24 lines of Seamus Heaney’s “Elegy”, inscribed to Shozun-Tokenaga and presumably specially copied for him. The manuscript shows no variant readings from the printed version and has thus association value only. Nonetheless, such items are important to understanding the value poets—and the culture as a whole—put on manuscripts.
There is also an autograph fair copy of Rudyard Kipling’s “White Horses”, presumably dating from 1897, which was used as printer’s copy. At the top of the document is an instruction to the printer as to where he has to return the proof. The manuscript contains several small alterations and a cancelled and revised version of stanza 9. The differences between the deleted and the rewritten stanza, however, are minimal; while not exactly a currente calamo revision, the impression is that Kipling anticipated the changes to be greater than they actually would turn out to be, as he was recomposing the poem in his head. With this manuscript, is also a corrected proof.Last week Christie’s sold a postcard from James Joyce to Sean O’Casey from May 1939 on The Irish Times’ misattribution of Finnegans Wake to the Irish playwright.


0 comments:
Post a Comment